INZ declines application because the appellant did not have good employment prospects

Holger Weischede, a senior immigration adviser of NZIHS, acted as the Representative for the Appellant. INZ was not satisfied that he had demonstrated that he could realise his potential to successfully settle in and contribute to New Zealand

 

WIX, Photo/File

 

By J Donald (Member) of the Ministry of Justice

30 April, 2010


This is an appeal against the decision of Immigration New Zealand (INZ) declining the application because the appellant did not have good employment prospects and was not considered to be well-prepared and familiar about settling in New Zealand. INZ was not satisfied that he had demonstrated that he could realise his potential to successfully settle in and contribute to New Zealand


The main issues for the Board are whether the INZ decision was arrived at following a proper process which should have included a correct application of the settlement and contribution requirements of policy and an interview which was properly focused on relevant issues and whether it was provided properly articulated reasons for its decision.


View Full Case Decision Here

res_20100430_16495e
.pdf
Download PDF • 104KB

Source: Ministry of Justice, Tribunals, Residence Decisions